A Comparative Study of Water and Gas Injection Simulation in Libyan X Field Using Eclipse Software

Main Article Content

Madi Abdullah Naser
Basher Mohammed Ammar

Abstract

The main goal of this study (which the comprehensive reservoir study for Libyan X Field plan of development) is to predict future performance of a reservoir and find ways and means of optimizing the recovery of some of the hydrocarbon under various operating conditions. The simulator results show the reservoir pressure history curve is matching to the stimulation curve, this gives a good indication of the input data that has been entered to the model. The driving mechanism for all those reservoirs it comes from three natural forces, which are fluid expansion, PV compressibility, and water influx. The best method to choose as secondary recovery for this oil field is water and gas Injection. Water and gas Injection have the largest Total Field Recovery. Water and gas Injection have the highest Reservoir Pressure at the end of the project. The highest percentage of oil recovery was when the water and gas were injected and it reached 58%, then when the water was injected and it reached 55%, and then when the gas was actually injected and it reached 54%. The field pressure rise was greater when water and gas were injected, and the pressure reached 792 psi, while it was less when only water was injected, reaching 435.5 psi, and when only gas was injected, it reached 412.9 psi. Finally, central objective of this master thesis with the help of reservoir simulation fulfilled to produce future prediction that will lead to optimize reservoir performance which meant reservoir developed in the manner that brings utmost benefit to the commercial business.

Article Details

How to Cite
Naser , M. A., & Ammar, B. M. (2024). A Comparative Study of Water and Gas Injection Simulation in Libyan X Field Using Eclipse Software. Sebha University Conference Proceedings, 3(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.51984/sucp.v3i2.3207
Section
Confrence Proceeding

References

Stosur, G.J., Hite, J.R., Carnahan, N.F., Miller, K., 2003. The alphabet soup of IOR, EOR and AOR: effective communication requires a definition of terms. Paper SPE 84908 presented at the SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, 20–21 October. Montaron, B., 2008. Carbonate evolution. Oil & Gas Middle East (August), 26–31.

Ahmed, T.: “Reservoir Engineering Handbook”, Gulf Publishing Company, Texas, 2000.

Craft, B., and Hawkins, M.: “Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering”, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey, (1991).

Aziz, K., and Settari, A.: “Petroleum Reservoir Simulation”, Applied Science Publishers, London, (1979).

Eclipse 2007 Manual.

Chen, Z.: “Formulations and numerical methods of the black oil model in porous media”, SIAM J, Numer, Anal, 38, 489–514. (2000).

Peaceman, D, W.: “Fundamentals of Numerical Reservoir Simulation”, Elsevier, New York, (1977).

Ahmed, T., and Paul, D.: “Advanced Reservoir Engineering”. Gulf Publishing Company, Texas, 2000.

Harpole, Kj.: “Reservoir Environments and Their Characterization” International Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston, (1985).

Wilhite, G, P.: “Waterflooding”, SPE Textbook Series Volume 3, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas, (1986).

Omre, H.: “Improved production forecasts and history matching using approximate fluid-flow simulators”. SPE J., 9(3), 339–351, London, 2004.

Ruijian, Li, A. and Oliver, D, S.: “History matching of three-phase flow production data”.SPE J., 8(4), 328–340, Scotland, 2003.

Lemigas.: “Analysis PVT Fluid Reservoir (Ks-72)Final Report”,1-23.(1999).

John, R.: “Principal of Applied Reservoir Simulation”, Gulf Professional Poblishing, Houston, Texas, (2001)