Performance of self-compacting concrete containing recycled coarse aggregate.

Main Article Content

Alsaadi Alsaidi
Mohamed Yahya
Ibrahim Gargar

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of self-compacting concrete when replacing natural coarse aggregate with recycled aggregate at varying ratios (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%), in the context of promoting sustainability in the construction sector and reducing dependence on natural resources. Natural aggregate from the Jufrah region in Libya was used as the primary source, while the recycled aggregate was obtained from crushed concrete, addressing the issue of waste disposal from demolished buildings. The compressive strength of the mixes was measured at different ages (3, 7, 21, 28, and 60 days). The results showed that the fresh properties of the mixes remained within EFNARC standards. Moreover, replacing 20% of natural aggregate with recycled aggregate resulted in a 6% reduction in compressive strength at 3 days and 15% at 28 days, while a 40% replacement led to a 10% reduction at 3 days and 25% at 28 days. These findings indicate that the use of recycled aggregate negatively affects compressive strength, especially at higher replacement levels. However, it can still be successfully used in specific applications within well-defined limits, contributing to environmental goals without significantly compromising concrete performance.               

Article Details

How to Cite
Alsaadi Alsaidi, Yahya , M., & Ibrahim Gargar. (2025). Performance of self-compacting concrete containing recycled coarse aggregate. Sebha University Conference Proceedings, 4(3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.51984/sucp.v4i3.4209
Section
Confrence Proceeding

References

H. Okamura and M. Ouchi, Self-compacting concrete, J. Adv. Concr. Technol., 2003, 1, 5–15.

EFNARC, The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete: Specification, Production and Use, European Federation of National Associations Representing Concrete, 2005.

M. Sonebi, Medium strength self-compacting concrete containing fly ash: Modeling using factorial experimental plans, Cem. Concr. Res., 2004, 34, 1199–1208.

V.W.Y. Tam, X.F. Gao and C.M. Tam, Comparing the quality of concrete made with recycled and natural aggregates, J. Clean. Prod., 2008, 15, 1716–1720.

R. Prakash, R. Thenmozhi, S.N. Raman and C. Subramanian, Structural Concrete, 2020, 21(1), 437–447.

K. Rahal, Build. Environ., 2007, 42(1), 407–415.

V. Corinaldesi, Constr. Build. Mater., 2010, 24(9), 1616–1620.

L. Evangelista and J. de Brito, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(2), 129–172.

J. Hu, Z. Wang and Y. Kim, Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2013, 2(1), 20–34.

J.A. Bogas, J. de Brito and D. Ramos, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 115, 294–306.

S.K. Kirthika and S.K. Singh, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 250, 118850.

J. Xiao, Z. Ma, T. Sui, A. Akbarnezhad and Z. Duan, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 188, 720–731.

C.S. Poon, S.C. Kou and L. Lam, Use of recycled aggregates in concrete mixtures, Cem. Concr. Res., 2004, 34, 699–706.

M. Malešev, V. Radonjanin and S. Marinković, Recycled concrete as aggregate for structural concrete production, Sustainability, 2010, 2, 1204–1225.

S.C. Kou and C.S. Poon, Properties of self-compacting concrete prepared with coarse and fine recycled concrete aggregates, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2009, 31, 622–627.

S.W. Tabsh and A.S. Abdelfatah, Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 2009, 23, 1163–1167.

L.A. Pereira-de Oliveira, M. Nepomuceno and M. Rangel, An eco-friendly self-compacting concrete with recycled coarse aggregates, Informes de la Construcción, 2013, 65(Extra-1), 31–41.

J.M.V. Gómez-Soberón, Porosity of recycled concrete with substitution of recycled concrete aggregate: An experimental study, Cem. Concr. Res., 2002, 32, 1301–1311.

L. Butler, J.S. West and S.L. Tighe, The effect of recycled concrete aggregate properties on the bond strength between RCA concrete and steel reinforcement, Cem. Concr. Res., 2013, 41, 1037–1049.