The reality of the development of the Faculty of Arts between institutional accreditation and total quality from the point of view of the heads of departments at Sebha University, Faculty of Arts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51984/johs.v20i4.2347Keywords:
Institutional accreditation, Total quality, Improving and developing institutional performance, Colleges of educationAbstract
The research aimed to identify the role of developing the Faculty of Arts between institutional accreditation and total quality from the point of view of the heads of departments at the Faculty of Arts, Sebha University, and to shed light on institutional accreditation, total quality and development and improvement processes within the Faculty of Arts. The researcher used the descriptive analytical approach to know the views of department heads. Faculty of Arts in the reality of development between institutional accreditation and total quality, and the research sample consisted of (12) heads of department at the Faculty of Arts, and the research tool included a questionnaire prepared by the researcher, The results of the research concluded: There is a range of the reality of development in the Faculty of Arts between accreditation, institutional and total quality from the point of view of department heads at Sebha University, followed by no statistically significant differences over the extent of the reality of the development of the Faculty of Arts between institutional accreditation and total quality due to the gender variable (males and females), Academic qualifications (Master's and Ph.D.), and years of experience from 4 years to 12 years or more.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Humanities Policy on Intellectual Property and Plagiarism
1. Commitment to Intellectual Property and Ethics
The Journal of Humanities (JOHS) is fully committed to respecting intellectual property rights and aims to protect the originality and authentic work of authors who submit their manuscripts for publication. The journal takes a firm stand against articles that contain any form of plagiarism and emphasizes the need for all researchers to adhere to the highest ethical standards in scientific research.
2. Anti-Plagiarism Policy
The journal considers plagiarism a serious violation of academic ethics. Therefore, authors must ensure that their work is original and not plagiarized, and that any use of external sources is properly cited and documented according to correct academic standards.
-
Actions Taken: In the event that any plagiarism or academic theft is discovered in a submitted article, the editorial board will contact the author to request a formal explanation within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of notification.
-
Investigation and Decision: After receiving the explanation, the article will be referred to the journal's specialized committees, which will investigate the matter and take the necessary measures, which may include the permanent rejection of the article and the imposition of disciplinary actions.
3. Publication License and Author Rights
The journal adopts the Creative Commons license type Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows for the following:
-
Attribution: Users are entitled to cite the content published in the journal and use it in their work, provided that the original source and author are clearly credited.
-
Non-Commercial: The published content may not be used for any commercial purpose.
-
NoDerivs: It is not permitted to make any modifications, distortions, or to build derivative works from the published content.
Under this license, authors are required to complete an exclusive license agreement for the journal. Authors retain the rights to their research data and may reuse and share their work for scientific purposes with proper citation.
