Ibn Sina and the controversy over his being the philosopher (Sheikh) and the loyal physician
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51984/johs.v23i1.3099Keywords:
الكلمات المفتاحية: الهرمسية ـ نظرية الفيض ـ الغنوص ـ العقل الفعال. الإفلاطونية المُحدثةAbstract
This research is concerned with examining one of the significant issues in the history of the medieval Arab Islamic philosophy, related to the contribution of the influential philosopher ‘Sheikh Ibn Sina’, which was considered by many critics controversial by all the means, as some of them tend to consider it the peak of the development of philosophy in Islamic civilization. While others view it as decline of the Islamic civilizational project in its Eastern phase, this research set off from a problematic hypothesis that sees in the philosophy of Ibn Sina the commencement of adoption of the Gnostic discourse in Arab-Islamic culture and the decline of rational discourse, and to achieve this goal, the Sheikh relied on employing the theory the Gnostic overflow, in which he wanted to establish a compound separation of two types ; the first is concerned with drawing a dividing line that distinguishes the supralunar world and the sublunar world. Based on this distinction, the second separation is established, the scope of which will be the world under the orbit of the moon, and its subject is the separation between the soul and the body. By completing the two separations, the way is opened for the Gnostic Sufi discourse to enter the centre of Arab-Islamic culture. It is worth mentioning that the writer of this study tends to adopt the critical analytical Approach with the aim of interrogating texts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
License
Journal of Humanities Policy on Intellectual Property and Plagiarism
1. Commitment to Intellectual Property and Ethics
The Journal of Humanities (JOHS) is fully committed to respecting intellectual property rights and aims to protect the originality and authentic work of authors who submit their manuscripts for publication. The journal takes a firm stand against articles that contain any form of plagiarism and emphasizes the need for all researchers to adhere to the highest ethical standards in scientific research.
2. Anti-Plagiarism Policy
The journal considers plagiarism a serious violation of academic ethics. Therefore, authors must ensure that their work is original and not plagiarized, and that any use of external sources is properly cited and documented according to correct academic standards.
-
Actions Taken: In the event that any plagiarism or academic theft is discovered in a submitted article, the editorial board will contact the author to request a formal explanation within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of notification.
-
Investigation and Decision: After receiving the explanation, the article will be referred to the journal's specialized committees, which will investigate the matter and take the necessary measures, which may include the permanent rejection of the article and the imposition of disciplinary actions.
3. Publication License and Author Rights
The journal adopts the Creative Commons license type Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows for the following:
-
Attribution: Users are entitled to cite the content published in the journal and use it in their work, provided that the original source and author are clearly credited.
-
Non-Commercial: The published content may not be used for any commercial purpose.
-
NoDerivs: It is not permitted to make any modifications, distortions, or to build derivative works from the published content.
Under this license, authors are required to complete an exclusive license agreement for the journal. Authors retain the rights to their research data and may reuse and share their work for scientific purposes with proper citation.


