provisions With examples of its jurisprudential Negating thedifference and its effect on inferring the legal applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51984/johs.v19i1.923Keywords:
inference, Islamic rulig, the difference, measurement, negationAbstract
Negating the difference and its effect on inferring the legal provision This research deals with (denying the difference and its effect on inferring the legal rulings with examples of its jurisprudential applications) and has divided it into three sections, which dealt in the first topic: the definition of the denial of the difference in terms, methods and its truth among the fundamentalists, which in turn is three demands, the first requirement: the definition of the negation of the difference in language and idiomatically The second requirement: absolute expressions on the negation of the difference, the third requirement: methods of eliminating the negation of the difference between the origin and the branch. According to the fundamentalists, as for the third topic, it dealt with the types of denial of the difference with examples of its jurisprudential applications, and it contains three demands, the first requirement: the types of negation of the difference and the second requirement: jurisprudential models in which the difference was excluded, while the third requirement was: jurisprudential models denying the difference in which an assumption is often contested. For certainty.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Humanities Policy on Intellectual Property and Plagiarism
1. Commitment to Intellectual Property and Ethics
The Journal of Humanities (JOHS) is fully committed to respecting intellectual property rights and aims to protect the originality and authentic work of authors who submit their manuscripts for publication. The journal takes a firm stand against articles that contain any form of plagiarism and emphasizes the need for all researchers to adhere to the highest ethical standards in scientific research.
2. Anti-Plagiarism Policy
The journal considers plagiarism a serious violation of academic ethics. Therefore, authors must ensure that their work is original and not plagiarized, and that any use of external sources is properly cited and documented according to correct academic standards.
-
Actions Taken: In the event that any plagiarism or academic theft is discovered in a submitted article, the editorial board will contact the author to request a formal explanation within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of notification.
-
Investigation and Decision: After receiving the explanation, the article will be referred to the journal's specialized committees, which will investigate the matter and take the necessary measures, which may include the permanent rejection of the article and the imposition of disciplinary actions.
3. Publication License and Author Rights
The journal adopts the Creative Commons license type Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows for the following:
-
Attribution: Users are entitled to cite the content published in the journal and use it in their work, provided that the original source and author are clearly credited.
-
Non-Commercial: The published content may not be used for any commercial purpose.
-
NoDerivs: It is not permitted to make any modifications, distortions, or to build derivative works from the published content.
Under this license, authors are required to complete an exclusive license agreement for the journal. Authors retain the rights to their research data and may reuse and share their work for scientific purposes with proper citation.
