Majnun Laila in Al-Daylami text: Between the multiplicity of existence and the identification of identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51984/johs.v20i1.1522Keywords:
Madman, Narrative, Sufism, Possible worlds, IdentityAbstract
Narratology are no longer captive to the traditional structural view since the end of the twentieth century. New turns in the epistemological fields around them have pushed them to drop The separation wall between text and its contexts, from these turns is the linguistic After the opening of linguistics to the context, the self is presented in the text and linked in situation, the theorists of the narrative did not find it seemed from turning into this openness and being influenced by it. However, this turning point made narratives directed more to discourse than to story, and the narrative is only correct with them. That is why narrative theorists have found in the developments of the humanities and social sciences what complements this deficiency. Looking at the story is no longer limited to events and the extent of change in cases of narrative aid and its stations only. Rather, it is as a representation of an individual human experience that stores the experiences of societies. Accordingly, this research seeks to analyze one of the traditional narratives that represent the most important human experiences, which are the love narratives. The stories of the lovers confuse the verbal with the book, the marginal with the central, and the self with the other. And above all, the historical, literary and religious confusion? What relationship does the news of lovers establish with these discourses, and specifically the Sufi discourse? What relationship does a madman have with the world of love? What is the acquired identity of a madman of love in Sufi discourse? We will try to answer these questions, supplicating the possible-worlds theory approach.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Humanities Policy on Intellectual Property and Plagiarism
1. Commitment to Intellectual Property and Ethics
The Journal of Humanities (JOHS) is fully committed to respecting intellectual property rights and aims to protect the originality and authentic work of authors who submit their manuscripts for publication. The journal takes a firm stand against articles that contain any form of plagiarism and emphasizes the need for all researchers to adhere to the highest ethical standards in scientific research.
2. Anti-Plagiarism Policy
The journal considers plagiarism a serious violation of academic ethics. Therefore, authors must ensure that their work is original and not plagiarized, and that any use of external sources is properly cited and documented according to correct academic standards.
-
Actions Taken: In the event that any plagiarism or academic theft is discovered in a submitted article, the editorial board will contact the author to request a formal explanation within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of notification.
-
Investigation and Decision: After receiving the explanation, the article will be referred to the journal's specialized committees, which will investigate the matter and take the necessary measures, which may include the permanent rejection of the article and the imposition of disciplinary actions.
3. Publication License and Author Rights
The journal adopts the Creative Commons license type Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows for the following:
-
Attribution: Users are entitled to cite the content published in the journal and use it in their work, provided that the original source and author are clearly credited.
-
Non-Commercial: The published content may not be used for any commercial purpose.
-
NoDerivs: It is not permitted to make any modifications, distortions, or to build derivative works from the published content.
Under this license, authors are required to complete an exclusive license agreement for the journal. Authors retain the rights to their research data and may reuse and share their work for scientific purposes with proper citation.


