Reasons for conflicting narrations on the authority of Imam Malik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51984/johs.v21i2.2288Keywords:
Reasons, Conflict, Narratives, Jurisprudence, MalikiAbstract
In the name of of Allah the Merciful.
Praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and prayers and peace be upon the most honorable messengers, our Prophet Muhammad and all his family and companions. As for selling:
This is a simple research, in which I tried to collect the most important reasons for the conflict of jurisprudential narrations that we received from Imam Malik.
After knowing the contradiction, and knowing the narrations in language and terminology, I mentioned that there are seven main reasons for the conflicting narrations from Imam Malik, including:
The difference of Maliki scholars in the adoption of some assets, including the change in the jurisprudence of Imam Malik, and sometimes this is because the hadith of Imam Malik - may God have mercy on him - did not reach.
It may be due to a difference in a form, or a letter, or a word that was transmitted from the imam, or because of a mistake or delusion from those who narrated from the imam or without them.
This may be due to lying about the imam, and the contradiction may be due to the disagreement of the Malikis in understanding the words of Imam Malik - may God have mercy on him.
Then I mentioned a conclusion in which the most important findings of the research
thanks God first and last
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Humanities Policy on Intellectual Property and Plagiarism
1. Commitment to Intellectual Property and Ethics
The Journal of Humanities (JOHS) is fully committed to respecting intellectual property rights and aims to protect the originality and authentic work of authors who submit their manuscripts for publication. The journal takes a firm stand against articles that contain any form of plagiarism and emphasizes the need for all researchers to adhere to the highest ethical standards in scientific research.
2. Anti-Plagiarism Policy
The journal considers plagiarism a serious violation of academic ethics. Therefore, authors must ensure that their work is original and not plagiarized, and that any use of external sources is properly cited and documented according to correct academic standards.
-
Actions Taken: In the event that any plagiarism or academic theft is discovered in a submitted article, the editorial board will contact the author to request a formal explanation within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of notification.
-
Investigation and Decision: After receiving the explanation, the article will be referred to the journal's specialized committees, which will investigate the matter and take the necessary measures, which may include the permanent rejection of the article and the imposition of disciplinary actions.
3. Publication License and Author Rights
The journal adopts the Creative Commons license type Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows for the following:
-
Attribution: Users are entitled to cite the content published in the journal and use it in their work, provided that the original source and author are clearly credited.
-
Non-Commercial: The published content may not be used for any commercial purpose.
-
NoDerivs: It is not permitted to make any modifications, distortions, or to build derivative works from the published content.
Under this license, authors are required to complete an exclusive license agreement for the journal. Authors retain the rights to their research data and may reuse and share their work for scientific purposes with proper citation.
