Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models in coastal Mediterranean and mountainous regions of Libya
Abstract
This research was carried out to evaluate performance of nine reference evapotranspiration (ET0) models against the standard FAO Penman-Monteith model and identify suitable alternative models to FAO Penman-Monteith at mountainous and coastal regions of Libya. Shahat and Nalut sites represents mountainous region and Benghazi, Sirt and Tripoli sites representing coastal region of Libya. The models tested against the standard FAO Penman-Monteith model were the FAO Radiation, FAO Blaney Criddle, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor, Makkink, Turc, Thornthwaite, Kharrufa, and Khosla. The results illustrate that FAO Radiation model overestimated standard ETo values. In contrast, the models of Hargreaves-Samani, Makkink, Turc and Thornthwaite underestimated standard ETo values. However, models of FAO Blaney-Criddle, Priestley-Taylor and Kharrufa overestimated standard ETo values in some months and underestimated standard ETo values in other months. The statistical criterions used are index of agreement, modeling efficiency, root mean square error, mean bias error, % mean bias error, coefficient of determination and t-test. Statistical results reveal that the FAO Blaney-Criddle model had superior performance among the other models. FAO Blaney-Criddle model ranked the first in Mountainous and coastal regions except in Tripoli site. Thornthwaite and Khosla models performed poorly in the all study sites. All other models performed irregularly different. T-test analysis at 5 % level of significance indicated that there are significant differences between the standard FAO Penman-Monteith and all models in both regions, except FAO Blaney-Criddle and Kharrufa models in Shahat and Nalut sites, Priestley-Taylor model in Sirt site and FAO Radiation model in Tripoli site.
Full text article
Authors
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In a brief statement, the rights relate to the publication and distribution of research published in the journal of the University of Sebha where authors who have published their articles in the journal of the university of Sebha should how they can use or distribute their articles. They reserve all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
- Copyright and other property rights related to the article, such as patent rights.
- Research published in the journal of the University of Sebha and used in its future works, including lectures and books, the right to reproduce articles for their own purposes, and the right to self-archive their articles.
- The right to enter a separate article, or for a non-exclusive distribution of their article with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the journal of Sebha University.
Privacy Statement The names and e-mail addresses entered on the Sabha University Journal site will be used for the aforementioned purposes only and for which they were used.