An Evaluative Study of Environmental Topics in the Science Curriculum for Middle Schools in Libya

Tarek Mukassabi (1) , Nisreen Birras Ali (2)
(1) Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya,
(2) Environmental Science and Engineering Department, Environmental Science Division, The Libyan Academy for Postgraduate Studies, Benghazi, Libya

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the content of science textbooks for grades seven, eight, and nine (middle school level) in Libya in terms of the environmental values and issues they address. It also sought to compare this content with science curricula at the same level in Egypt and Canada, in addition to assessing its alignment with UNESCO's recommendations regarding environmental topics that should be included in school curricula. The results showed that the proportion of environmental lessons in Libyan middle school science curricula does not exceed 13.85% of the total lessons, which is the lowest compared to other scientific fields (chemistry, physics, and biology). Furthermore, the comparative analysis revealed that the percentage of environmental lessons was 13.8% in Libya, compared to 25.9% in Egypt and 37.7% in Canada, placing Libya last in terms of attention to environmental content. When comparing the environmental content of the Libyan curricula with UNESCO’s recommended list of environmental topics, it was found that only 18 out of 58 topics were covered, representing just 31%.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

1. فراج محسن. تنمیة بعض عناصر التنور البیئي لدى طلاب كلیة التربیة جامعة الملك خالد باستخدام المودیلات التعلیمیة. المجلة المصرية للتربیة العلمیة 2000؛ المجلد 3. ع1: 122-87.

2. Joos L. ‘Only One Earth’: Environmental perceptions and policies before the Stockholm conference, 1968–1972. Journal of Global History 2023; 18 (2): 281-303. DOI:10.1017/S1740022823000013.

3. وطفة علي. التربية البيئية في مواجهة التحديات الإيكولوجية المعاصرة من منظور أممي. مركز نقد وتنوير[الانترنت] 2021. (اخر دخول 26 فبراير 2026) https://tanwair.com/archives/12064

4. Tatlılıoğlu E. Analysis of science curriculum and textbooks in terms of sustainable development goals. Thesis (M.S.), Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Mathematics and Science Education., Middle East Technical University 2019.

5. الذيب نجاح. تباين سلوك الفرد ودوره في حماية البيئة من التلوث بمدينة الزاوية دراسة في الجغرافيا السلوكية. رسالة ماجستير، إدارة الدراسات العليا والتدريب، قسم الجغرافيا، شعبة بشري، جامعة الزاوية 2020.

6. United Nations. UNESCO: United nations educational, scientific and cultural organization. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/education/united-nations-educational-scientific-and-cultural-organization-unesco (last accessed 23 April 2026).

7. UNESCO. UNESCO urges making environmental education a core curriculum component in all countries by 2025. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-urges-making-environmental-education-core-curriculum-component-all-countries-2025 (last accessed 23 April 2026).

8. UNESCO. Director-General. UN. Secretary-General. Education for sustainable development in the framework of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4086971?v=pdf (last accessed 23 April 2026).

9. Sustainable Development Goals. Take action for the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (last accessed 23 April 2026).

10. UNESCO. Greening curriculum guidance/ Teaching and learning for climate action. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, Paris 07 SP, France 2024.

https://www.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2024/09/Greening%20curriculum%20guidance%20Teaching%20and%20learning%20for%20climate%20action.pdf (last accessed 23 April 2026).

11. UNEP. United Nations Environment Programme. Annual Report. 2021.

https://www.unep.org/resources/annual-report-2021 (last accessed 23 April 2026).

12. Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN. Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 1987; 18(2):1–8. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482

13. WHO. Healthy Environments for Healthier Populations. 13 September 2019. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/environment-climate-change-and-health/health-environment-2019-easyprint.pdf?sfvrsn=fede2ef8_2 (last accessed 23 April 2026).

14. UNEP. Global Environment Outlook - GEO-6. 4 March, 2019. https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6 (last accessed 23 April 2026).

15. Stern PC. Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3):407-24. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175

16. Ostrom E. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 2010; 20(4): 550-57.

17. UNEP. Single-Use Plastics: A Roadmap for Sustainability. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/single-use-plastics-roadmap-sustainability (last accessed 23 April 2026). (last accessed 23 April 2026).

18. Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 2005; 309(5737):1036-39. DOI:10.1126/science.1112122.

19. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges. 2017.

https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i6583e (last accessed 23 April 2026).

20. WHO. Air Pollution and Child Health: Prescribing Clean Air. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/air-pollution-and-child-health (last accessed 23 April 2026).

21. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu NN, et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 2018 Feb 3;391(10119):462-512.

22. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (last accessed 23 April 2026).

23. UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) A roadmap. 2020.

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802 (last accessed 23 April 2026).

24. Pauw JB, Petegem PV. The Effect of Flemish Eco‐Schools on Student Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Affect. International Journal of Science Education 2011; 33(11):1513-1538.m DOI:10.1080/09500693.2010.540725

25. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 2002; 8(3): 239–60. DOI:10.1080/13504620220145401

26. UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. 2017. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (last accessed 23 April 2026).

27. Stern PC, Gardner GT, Vandenbergh MP, Dietz T, Gilligan JM. Design principles for carbon emissions reduction programs. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;44(13):4847-48 DOI:10.1021/es100896p

28. Sobel D. Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Education for meaning and social justice 2004; 17(3): 63-4.

29. Smith GA, Sobel D. (2010). Place- and Community-Based Education in Schools.1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2010. DOI:10.4324/9780203858530

30. Chawla L, Cushing DF. Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Researc 2007; 13 (4): 437-452. DOI:10.1080/13504620701581539

31. Ardoin NM, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR. Developing a conservation behavior framework for youth. Environmental Education Research 2013.

32. World Bank 2020. Libya's Economic Update. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/314751603047345007-0280022020/original/10mpoam20libyalbykcm.pdf (last accessed 23 April 2026).

33. OECD. PISA Report: Are Students Ready to Take on Environmental Challenges? 2019. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/12/are-students-ready-to-take-on-environmental-challenges_fbde6084/8abe655c-en.pdf (last accessed 23 April 2026).

34. FAO. Libyan Land Cover Reference System. 2023. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7f17f985-ff43-46a5-99ec-3e71d552be4b/content (last accessed 23 April 2026).

35. UNCCD. Land Degradation Neutrality in Northern Africa. 2020. https://www.unccd.int/land-and-life/land-degradation-neutrality/overview (last accessed 23 April 2026).

36. World Bank. Water Scarcity Solutions in MENA. 2022. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d11bb0c0-8084-4590-ac1d-18d9ed7c364d/content (last accessed 23 April 2026).

37. Brika, B. Water Resources and Desalination in Libya: A Review. Proceedings 2018, 2, 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2110586

38. IRENA. Libya Energy Profile. 2024. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Statistics/Statistical_Profiles/Africa/Libya_Africa_RE_SP.pdf (last accessed 23 April 2026).

39. El-Katiri, L. A Roadmap for Renewable Energy in the Middle East and North Africa, OIES Paper, MEP 6 (Oxford: The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies). 2014. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wpcontent/uploads/2014/01/MEP-6.pdf (last accessed 23 April 2026).

40. IUCN. Red List of Threatened Species: Libya. 2024. https://www.iucnredlist.org/search/map?query=libya%20 red%20 list search Type=species (last accessed 23 April 2026).

41. Etayeb K, Petralia A, Bourass E. Natural Protected Areas and National Parks in Libya. 3rd International Congress “Biodiversity, Mediterranean, Society” Noto-Vendicari (Italy) (2015):177-188.

42. Abdunaser K. Oil Pollution Monitoring and Detection Using GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques: A Case Study from Libya. In Environmental Applications of Remote Sensing and GIS in Libya 2022 Jun 30 (pp. 227-243). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

43. Busheina IS, Kammashi M, Etorki AM, EL-Rouissi RH. Assessment and measurement of atmospheric pollution (Particulate Matter) around Zawiya City-Libya. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology. 2017;7(473):2161-0525.

44. World Bank (2018). Libya Dashboard. Climate Change Knowledge Portal. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/libya (last accessed 23 April 2026).

45. وزارة التربية والتعليم الليبية. منصة المناهج الدراسية للمرحلة الأساسية. 2024. https://moe.gov.ly/curricula/ (اخر دخول له 23 أبريل 2026)

Authors

Tarek Mukassabi
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Nisreen Birras Ali
An Evaluative Study of Environmental Topics in the Science Curriculum for Middle Schools in Libya. (2026). Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences , 25(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.51984/4hqa2992

Article Details

How to Cite

An Evaluative Study of Environmental Topics in the Science Curriculum for Middle Schools in Libya. (2026). Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences , 25(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.51984/4hqa2992

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Assessment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Patients From South of Libya

Almahdi Melad Aljadi, Momen Abdou Alkhir, Mahmoud Hussein Milad
Abstract View : 723
Download :421

Diagnostic Study of Excessive water production in Aswad Oilfield, Libya

Abdulmaein Bin Younus , Elnori Elhaddad
Abstract View : 1029
Download :1102