Attitudes of Faculty Members at Libyan Universities toward Employing E-learning in the Cases of Emergency and Crises
Abstract
This study aims to explore the attitudes of faculty members at Libyan universities toward employing e-learning in the cases of emergency and crises. It also aims to examine to what extent differences in attitudes of faculty members are attributed to (gender, qualification, scientific degree, work experience, and teaching area). A total of 190 faculty members at Libyan universities were surveyed using an online questionnaire. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the collected data. The results of this study indicated that the overall attitude of faculty members at Libyan universities was high, indicating that e-learning can be successfully applied in the cases of emergency and crises. The results also revealed that attitudes of faculty members do not differ based on the personal and functional factors. The analytical analysis also revealed that approximately 70% of the participants prefer interactive e-learning, and 35% of the participants prefer cooperative e-learning.
Full text article
References
[1]-Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control(pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[2]-Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
[3]-Algahtani, A.F. (2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia from Male Students' Perceptions, Durham theses, Durham University.
[4]-Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In Murchison C. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
[5]-Alodail, A. (2016). The Instructors' Attitudes toward the Use of E-Learning in Classroom in College of Education at Albaha University.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET,15(1), 126-135.
[6]-Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education.International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,12(1), 29-42.
[7]-Bidin, S., & Ziden, A. A. (2013). Adoption and application of mobile learning in the education industry.Procedia-social and behavioral sciences,90, 720-729.
[8]-Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1145–1156.
[9]-Chen, C. W. (2010). Brief introduction of new instruction –network learning. Living Technology Education Journal, 34(4), 10-16
[10]-Cherry, K., & Gns, S. (2018). Attitudes and behavior in psychology.Social psychology.
[11]-Chowdhury, S. K., & Salam, M. (2017). Predicting Attitude Based on Cognitive, Affective and Conative Components: An Online Shopping Perspective.Stanford Journal of Business Studies.
[12]-de Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T., & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society.Dialogia, (29), 139-152.
[13]-Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). How to build an e-learning product: Factors for student/customer satisfaction.Business Horizons,56(1), 87-96.
[14]-El Alfy, S., Gómez, J. M., & Ivanov, D. (2017). Exploring instructors’ technology readiness, attitudes and behavioral intentions towards e-learning technologies in Egypt and United Arab Emirates.Education and Information Technologies,22(5), 2605-2627.
[15]-Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Intention and Behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
[16]-Gagne, M., & Shepherd, M. G. (2001). Distance learning in accounting: A comparison between distance and traditional graduate accounting class. T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 58-60.
[17]-Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why are attitudes important? In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 1–10). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[18]-Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multirative dada analysis: a global perspective. 7th end. New York: Pearson.
[19]-Jennex, M.E. (2005). Case Studies in Knowledge Management. Idea Group Publishing: Hersley.
[20]-Jeong, H. Y., & Hong, B. H. (2013). A practical use of learning system using user preference in ubiquitous computing environment.Multimedia tools and applications,64(2), 491-504.
[21]-Katane, I., Kristovska, I., & Katans, E. (2015). Evaluation of distance education environmental advantages.Engineering for Rural Development,20, 720-8.
[22]-Kyun Choi, Y., Kim, J., & McMillan, S. J. (2009). Motivators for the intention to use mobile TV: A comparison of South Korean males and females.International Journal of Advertising,28(1), 147-167.
[23]-Liu, M. T., Chu, R., Wong, I. A., Zúñiga, M. A., Meng, Y., & Pang, C. (2012). Exploring the relationship among affective loyalty, perceived benefits, attitude, and intention to use co‐branded products.Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
[24]-Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model.Computers in Human Behavior,45, 359-374.
[25]-Pickens, J. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions.Organizational behavior in health care,4(7).
[26]-Rohayani, A. H,Kurniabudi, Sharipuddin(2015). A literature review: readiness factors to measuring e-learning readiness in higher education.Procedia Computer Science,59, 230-234.
[27]-Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations.International Journal of Research in English Education,4(1), 80-88.
[28]-Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2019). Teachers’ intention to use educational video games: The moderating role of gender and age.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,56(3), 318-329.
[29]-Saunders, M., Lewis, P. &Thornhill, A. (2016) Research methods for business students. 7th edn. New York: Pearson Education.
[30]-Sawang, S., Newton, C., & Jamieson, K. (2013). Increasing learners’ satisfaction/intention to adopt more e‐learning.Education+ Training.
[31]-Schiffman, L. and L.L. Kanuk, 2004.Consumer Behavior. 8th Edn., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle.
[32]-Shittu, A. T., Basha, K. M., AbdulRahman, N. S. N., & Ahmad, T. B. T. (2011). Investigating students' attitude and intention to use social software in higher institution of learning in Malaysia.Multicultural Education & Technology Journal.
[33]-Sloan, D., Porter, E., Robins, K., & McCourt, K. (2014). Using e-learning to support international students’ dissertation preparation. Education + Training, 56(2/3), 122–140.
[34]-ŠUmak, B., HeričKo, M., & PušNik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types.Computers in Human Behavior,27(6), 2067-2077.
[35]-Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China.Computers & Education,69, 169-180.
[36]-Wagner, N., Hassanein, K. & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-learning in Higher Education? A Stakeholders’ Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 26-36.
[37]-Wang, W. T., & Wang, C. C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems.Computers & Education,53(3), 761-774.
[38]-Wu, J. H., Hsia, T. L., Liao, Y. W., & Tennyson, R. D. (2008(. What determinates student learning satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment?.
[39]-Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment.Computers & Education,55(1), 155-164.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In a brief statement, the rights relate to the publication and distribution of research published in the journal of the University of Sebha where authors who have published their articles in the journal of the university of Sebha should how they can use or distribute their articles. They reserve all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
- Copyright and other property rights related to the article, such as patent rights.
- Research published in the journal of the University of Sebha and used in its future works, including lectures and books, the right to reproduce articles for their own purposes, and the right to self-archive their articles.
- The right to enter a separate article, or for a non-exclusive distribution of their article with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the journal of Sebha University.
Privacy Statement The names and e-mail addresses entered on the Sabha University Journal site will be used for the aforementioned purposes only and for which they were used.